Dissertation on Time and Religion Now, before you go about exercising the first tenet this country was founded on (free speech) keep Luther in mind (my homie Martin, not king.) If you don’t understand this reference and are curious, please state so and ask. Honor lies in the seeking of knowledge, not the blind affirmation of others thoughts and or interpretations. While you read this I would ask you to please consider the following questions the whole time. Are you a member of an Organization that is involved in the abuse of children? Do you find this abhorrent? Do you periodically speak out about this to the leaders of whichever organization you prefer? What do the most pubic leaders have to say? Do you think it’s okay if the upper echelons of your organization abuse kids and instead of the children receiving a shred of justice. Leaders unapologetically send their condolences, nice. Do you think that how explicitly those with means could get out of crimes in the old testament is, like, kind of strange? Somewhat curious also, is the fact that such a system existed for so long. Then suddenly and unexpectedly from the ranks of the common a savior arrives and all the rules change. A system that ran without issues for those in power (Cause, believe me, that’s the only people that mattered at the time or for the moment, now) has to be fundamentally changed for the continued control of the masses. We know this, because the bible you read today was hand picked. An event called the Council of Rome. Leaders will try to persuade you that none of these particular events are important. The only thing that has any meaning is the message. Try to inquire and see what sort of answer you get, if any. If you believe the church is all knowing, did jesus ever say that? If the message is so important, why are their leaders not practicing it? Jesus spoke of justice and helping the needy. I don’t recall anything about hooking up child molesters and hiding them while the children suffer. If your religious leaders have knowledge they aren’t sharing hook me up. (This statement is honestly a bit tongue in cheek, cause they do. However, none of it says rape kids and then move the rapists around Jesus said so.) When you have a system that says one thing and the leaders do the exact opposite showing any sort of dedication to that particular institution makes you look like an idiot. You know this subconsciously, and consciously don’t want to. Ask one no questions and you will get no lies. However, not accepting this truth could def lead to some physical manifestations of mental trauma. The two easily illustrated points above can honestly only lead to one simple conclusion. The bible began as a Book in regard to the path to righteous enlightenment. There are a number of tombs in regard to this already. When I think of the burning of the library of Alexander I feel great lament because of this. Earlier tombs of knowledge mention the other side as well. The nature of all things is balance. We don’t hear stories about the left hand path typically. There a not even subtle clue here. If you take the left hand path, there is nothing “right” in it. Today’s posts of groups with a similar name have taken tenets from the righteous path and portrayed them as their own. Trying to garner information typically leads to failuer. If knowledge of this nature is not “earned” then it can not truly be known. Their book is already written, stagnant. Agents of this nature operate in the proverbial shadows. I’ve personally always found that if what you are doing doesn’t have the strength to stand the light, then your particular endeavor only has the presumed power of exclusivity. Certainly respectable though. I mean, monkeys have it. I actually concur with the major tenets of the bible. However, “It’s easier to thread the hair of a camel through the eye of a needle than the rich to enter heaven.” In addition to “Do what you can for the poor.” When we look at just these though, We come up with some inconsistencies. Theoretically, the rich get in the same way the poor do, right? Belief in the savior regardless of their actions on Earth. Well, like that seem real weird cause uh it the same thing right? The second point also strange. Do what you can for the poor but def render under Cesar. Real weird, one second the Jman be flipping the tables of tax collectors but after a Roman council decided what the present bible would consist of. The same book include a passage about him and how paying taxes real righteous. I figure throughout antiquity, people smarter than myself have noticed the same thing and wondered about these glaring issues. Where are they now? Untempered hearts and minds are weak. My present working theory, is they sold out the poor to get in cahoots with a system any in depth examination should lead a person to despise. Unless they were on the other side of the short end. “Bold claims require the same equivalent of evidence.” Are the words, I with earnest hope your inner monologue reiterates the entire time you read the last paragraph or were uttered at least once. Since I previously stated there is no honor in unquestioning acceptance, only chains for yourself. Let’s take a quote from the 1995 movie, “The Usual Suspects.” “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” -Kevin Spacey This movie was written by one Christopher McQuarrie. If you recall the people be going to see this nonsense and believe news, or for that matter keep up on memes (Quick side note of fun trivia, this a term that originated with this dude named Jung. Neat guy. Check it out.) Spacey was later outed as a child molester. However, later he came out as gay and because of his “bravery” the whole affair was mostly swept under the rug. The meme community however, contains, perhaps even is mostly made up of members of the common folk. Brought forth memes, of which the scene originated from the movie seven. The famous box scene. Spacey having just perpetrated a heinous crime says he has something to say. Stands up, says he gay and is then shown walking off. The whole thing is satire, however, like, kind of odd the writer would have this character say this? Curious indeed. Lucky for us that was the origination of the quote.. I kid, it actually shows up in varying forms through out antiquity. In 1856 “Spiritualism, a Satanic Delusion, and a Sign of the Times” by Pastor William Ramsey included this passage “One of the most striking proofs of the personal existence of Satan, which our times afford us, is found in the fact, that he has so influenced the minds of multitudes in reference to his existence and doings, as to make them believe that he does not exist; and that the hosts of Demons or Evil Spirits, over whom Satan presides as Prince, are only the phantacies of the brain, some halucination of mind. Could we have a stronger proof of the existence of a mind so mighty as to produce such results?” I took this example for the article located here: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2018/03/20/devil/ There are a number of other instances here. The people in this fruity little club get off on stroking their egos with these “super clever” inside jokes hidden in plain sight. The members of this club knew Spacey was molesting kids. They also knew the significance of the quote. However, such a thing would go over the heads of the uninitiated or “common.” Super elite and real fruity. Last sentence a possible obscure South Park reference. South Park was IMHO an impressive example of truth in a society that seems to be consistently drifting away from it. We have the previous examples from antiquity with the church. Let’s go into a much more recent and in all honesty startling development. The “murder” of Epstein. Then the murders of the various individuals that had implicated him. How coincidental, you may state. If you had some sort of developmental disability. This was literally, a huge smoking gun to the revelations of systems used to control humanity since the beginning of time. With an impunity that I honestly have difficulty fathoming. These people literally told EVERYONE that the guy died in his cell by suicide with both guards sleeping outside and a lack of a body. Pardon my use here but WHAT IN THE FUCK should have been everyone's response. Then, in an extremely telling sequence of events. The media showing no outrage whatsoever at discovering the innocence of the youth had been stolen from many en masse. Talked about it and then moved on. Sure we had some other “Important” events come up. NO, WE FUCKING DIDN’T. Attention was diverted to whatever else happened in the next days. The number of people brought to justice has been at or equal to none. America and indeed the world at large should be exhibiting such wrath towards the perpetrators that they need not fear any sort of atrocity like this again. Where is the outrage what happened here? We already know, or at least should. If you were paying attention, not yet in this paper but historically. I present you with the following quotations, I’ll also mention this book was written 2500 years ago, so like this knowledge not a new development. The problem is a large percentage of individuals don’t know what’s important, or perhaps even more damning, they aren’t paying attention. “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles” “Supreme excellence consists of breaking the enemies resistance without fighting.” I chose these three quotes for a specific reason. Remember them. They are extremely important. I know this is quite a few things to think about bear with me. Humanity started out understanding that spirituality and science were intertwined. During the time of Jesus we seemed to be better off as a whole than we are now. They or course had disesase and thing of that nature but I feel like their day to day life was much more fulfilling than the majority of peoples today. Let’s fast forward a bit to a dude named Frued. This dude was a psychoanalyst. He basically did a bunch of cocaine and gained an insight to the behavior of humans and the ease with which they could be controlled. He tried to share this wondrous tool he had discovered with others and because of this spent much of the rest of his life depressed. Many of his friends and collegues became overtaken with the drug and became shells of their former selves, Frued however was able to postulate many interesting theories sadly though or perhaps respectively he never capitalized on these and died desolate. Personally, I think the theories Frued came up with were common knowledge amongst the most powerful of the day. I think they purposefully had him shunned so that his theories wouldn’t garner more attention. The moment someone knows how they are being controlled the eaisier it is to break free from these proverbial shackles. Freud's nephew, a man by the name of Edward Bernays took Freud's theories and invented Marketing. This is actually my third least favorite American invention. The first being Yellow journalism. You can check into that as well, it’s the reason that Marijuana is illegal today. The second is planned obsolescence, Bernays was able to manipulate the masses into doing what companies wanted in terms of selling products. There is a fantastic documentary on this available on youtube called The Century of the Self - Part 1: "Happiness Machines … linked is the first portion but it delves into what happened to present day America, and why everything is so bad, During the course of all of this you will find people leaping and jumping to ban drugs as quickly as they feasibly could. One might question why as long as you don’t believe the media in regards to the safety of the public and or individual. Last I checked here in America we were about freedom as long as it didn’t endanger others. If we don’t have control of the self. If the state owns us outright we have no measure of freedom whatsoever. The answer is, those in power fear the knowledge or knowing that intense shifts in perspective can grant an individual. They believe that such insight should only be allotted to those in power. Which is why we have the variations of street drugs that are basically the same thing as prescribed except that single piece of paper grants legality while being poor and unable to attain such things leads to illegality. Do these substances present the possibility of danger? Why, answering no would be folly simply look at freud. However, does the human condition dictate that everyone should be given the opportunity. After being warned of the danger, to kick start their own enlightenment? The Church of Atomology answers this with a resounding yes, having been on both sides of the fence we understand more viewpoints than most. Please join us in this evolution of the present human experiment. Jesus attained the highest levels of enlightenment then perhaps sold out. Everyone has the capability. Does not this endeavor interest you? If you are afraid to die then you are already dead. - The Great Saint.